Georgi Stankov, May 22, 2017
The method of measurement of escape velocity in Hubble’s law is the determination of redshifts of selected galaxies. Hubble was the first astronomer to suggest a relationship between his application of the universal equation for the one-dimensional space-time of the visible universe (read here, here and here) and the redshifts observed by the Doppler effect. In my article on the Doppler effect from April this year
Doppler Effect Is the Universal Proof for the Reciprocity of Space and Time
I have shown that it is a ubiquitous phenomenon that demonstrates the reciprocity of space and time – that the two constituents (dimensions) of space-time are canonically conjugated entities. This fundamental knowledge is the core of all understanding of physics and cosmology. It is needless to reiterate, but I do it nonetheless for the sake of total clarity, that neither present-day physics nor cosmology have any clue about this fundamental property of energy = space-time = All-That-Is, which is the only object of their study. It is also the primary term of human or any other consciousness in All-That-Is. That is why the primary term is the first and only a priori axiom in the new Axiomatics of the Universal Law and there should not be any more if it is a true science.
I have used the Doppler effect to explain the mechanism of gravitation in my recent article The Mechanism of Gravitation – for the First Time Explained. It proves:
- Redshifts in visible light are observed when the space of the photon system confined by the source and the observer expands;
- violet-shifts are observed when the space of the system contracts.
These changes of space are relativistic and occur simultaneously everywhere in the universe. For instance, one can observe both redshifts and violet-shifts of distant galaxies. Altogether, redshifts are predominant. This has led to the idea of using them as a method of measurement of the escape velocity of galaxies in an “expanding” universe which is a wrongly postulated and so far unverified idea (or better “idio“) in current failed cosmology.
Georgi Stankov, May 20, 2017
As already mentioned (here, here and here), the “big bang“ hypothesis of the standard model of cosmology is based on two pillars:
- the cosmic background radiation (CBR) and
- the expansion of the universe as assessed by Hubble’s law.
If these pillars can be interpreted in a different way, for instance, by the Universal Law, then the standard model must be refuted.
In the previous article, I have explained how the idea of an expanding universe has evolved in cosmology, namely, from the one-sided perception of the vertical energy exchange between matter and photon space-time. In this article I shall discuss the interpretational flaws of CBR in modern cosmology.
The experimental confirmation of the CBR, as predicted by Gamov on the basis of Friedmann’s model and coincidentally discovered by Penzias and Wilson in the sixties, has evoked the mistaken conviction among cosmologists that the theoretical assumptions of the standard model of cosmology hold true. The key assumption of this model is that, from the very beginning, the universe has been dominated by an extremely hot blackbody radiation (hot photon space-time) that has cooled down during the adiabatic expansion of the universe to the present temperature of about 3K – hence the term 3K-CBR.
Georgi Stankov, May 18, 2017
The hot expanding hypothesis of the standard model in cosmology assumes that the universe, as observed today, has evolved from a state of homogeneous energy with a negligible space and incredible density which exploded in a small fraction of a second. This initial state of the universe is described as the “big bang“. Since then, the visible universe – recall that cosmologists can only perceive the visible universe – is believed to have been expanding incessantly. For further information on the “big bang” hypothesis and how this bogus idea was introduced historically in science read also this article:
The “Big Bang” Is Yet to Come in the Empty Brain Cavities of the Cosmologists – Two PAT Opinions
In the context of this cosmological outlook, Hubble’s law is interpreted as a “law of expansion“. As this law is an application of the universal equation, we must reject this cosmological interpretation on axiomatic grounds. I have shown that Hubble’s law assesses the constant space-time of the visible universe (see my previous article). The two natural constants that are derived from this law, the radius of the visible universe RU and Hubble time assessing the age of the expanding universe 1/ Ho = AU = 1/fvis, give the constant space and time of the visible universe and confirm this conclusion. In this way I eliminate the first basic pillar of the standard model – the interpretation of Hubble’s law as a law of universal expansion.
We shall now present additional proofs for this irrefutable conclusion. The idea of the expanding universe is a consequence of the faulty idea of homogeneous space-time in the theory of relativity. I have shown in the new physical and mathematical theory of the Universal Law (volume I and volume II) that Einstein had not completely corrected the empty Euclidean space of classical mechanics, but had only introduced the reciprocity of space and time for the systems of matter.
Einstein regarded the gravitational objects as embedded in empty and “massless” photon space-time defined as vacuum, which is an absolutely wrong idea (I have proved that photons have mass and thus eliminated another epic blunder of present-day cosmology – the existence of “dark matter“- that alone makes it to fake science). With respect to the reciprocity of space and time, he assumed in the general theory of relativity that vacuum could be curved or bent by local gravitation. The current interpretation is that the path of light is attracted by local gravitational potentials and for this reason cannot be a straight line in space.
When this space-time concept is applied to cosmology, it inevitably leads to the neglect of the finite lifetimes of stars, as they have been described by Chandrasekhar and have been only later verified in modern astrophysics. The finite lifetime of any gravitational system is a consequence of the energy exchange between matter and photon space-time.
Georgi Stankov, May 16, 2017
The equation of the Hubble’s Law as presented in the previous publication on cosmology shows that this cosmological law is an application of the Universal Law and assesses one-dimensional space-time according to the definition of the new Axiomatics:
dv = dl/dt = Hol = [1d-space-time]
As the Hubble constant Ho is a natural constant, the law assesses the constant space-time of the visible universe as the maximal particular system of All-That-Is that is accessible to human senses and material instruments:
dv = dl/dt = Holmax = [1d-space-time]
The proof is fairly simple. According to Hubble’s law, the maximal escape velocity dv which a galaxy reaches before it emits a light signal to the observer is the speed of light dv→c. As Hubble’s law claims universal validity, it also holds for escape velocities that are greater than c. In this case, the light emitted by galaxies with dv > c will not reach the observer because the speed of light is smaller than their opposite escape velocity. The resultant speed (space-time) of the emitted photons is negative with respect to the observer, that is, such photons will never reach the observer but they still exist and should be considered in cosmology.
As our information on any material celestial object in the universe is transmitted through photon space-time, galaxies with a higher escape velocity than the speed of light are no longer visible to the observer. This means that there is an event horizon of the visible universe, beyond which Hubble’s law still holds true, but can no longer be observed. The validity of Hubble’s law beyond the event horizon also follows from the fact that it is an application of the Universal Law of space-time, while the visible universe is a particular system thereof.
On “The Final Transmutation and Merging of the PAT With the 5D and Higher Dimensions
Dear George & Carla,
The night of May 13-14, I had a cyclic dream/nightmare. I was levitating in lotus position, spinning along vertical axis, loudly toning/resonating multiple frequencies at once in my head/body. There were many cycles, but I remember in all episodes I was levitating, and attempting to move my body back into another room.
I was ecstatic and of a higher-dimensional existence: conscious, automatic, aligned. But on some level, I was screaming for help and in anguish also. I could not anchor back into the physical body, nor make my sounds audible in 3D to receive help from the other room. (In contrast, I often talk in my sleep involuntarily, without conscious control.) The cycles continued maybe 10+ times and I kept momentarily seeing through physical eyes this blue light on an electronic in the room. So I realized despite the dream sequences, I was stuck, each time freshly terrible.
Finally my high-pitch tone made it through and my friend entered from the next room. (He has been present for several horrific nightmare experiences in the past weeks.) I heard him and kept making the sound as a feint cry for help, and he nudged me. I had sensation but could not anchor. Eventually I could mumble ‘Help’, and then ‘Hands’, and he shook me and moved me. Finally I mumbled over and over ‘Help me wake up.’ After several minutes of getting a cold towel on neck and face and my hands massaged, and getting flopped around like a rag doll, I was still paralyzed. Finally, with moans and a burst of tears I reentered physicality.
The Truth about Inflation Theory
Daniel Akkerman, May 14, 2017
The inflation theory is one of the best examples of (scientific) Stockholm syndrome. Instead of recognizing the wrong basis of many of the theories of modern cosmology, an arbitrary, unnecessarily complex “escape card” is invented which does everything to keep the old paradigm of thinking alive, everything except employing logic that is. It is kind of like the infinite QE of the (not too big) to-fail banks. Instead of admitting defeat, they double down on stupidity.
But as not to waste the efforts of so many scientists, I have tried to somewhat preserve the theories of cosmology, although in a slightly different manner. Forgive me if I have copy pasted some of George’s article as a baseline.
1. The scientist’s (or human) brain is homogeneous and isotropic on average, at any place, at any time. This is called the “inner-cosmological principle“.
2. The brain expands according to Potato’s law with the escape velocity v of the neurons, which is proportional to the distance dl of good ideas to the thinker.
Georgi Stankov, March 14, 2017
After the Wesak-Full Moon portal that began around May 5th and is still ongoing today with unabated intensity I decided to give you this interim energy report for a number of reasons.
During the whole last week or so the energies from the source were particularly heavy and oppressive. The compression of our physical bodies was beyond human comprehension, the low vibrating energies of anguish and naked fears coming from the collective were unbearable with their overwhelming physical presence in our fields and our emotional barometer fell so low at times that it reached the bottom of the scale of total despair. I felt like Prometheus bound chained on a remote rock in this petrifying dungeon-reality while the voracious eagles were merciless devouring my expanded heart each day anew. This is the price one has to pay for bestowing humanity with the sacred fire of ascension.
Today I feel for the first time that we have emerged out of this birthing channel where life and death are “like twins that never meet”. The amplitude between the abyss of despair and divine bliss is incommensurable in these last days on this planet and it is nothing for people with faint hearts. That we know already.
Georgi Stankov, May 14, 2017
Today I was made aware of a heated dispute that is raging in the high ranks of modern cosmologists regarding the wrong assumptions on which this new science “cosmology” is based. In volume I, and much more extensively so in volume II, I have discussed the basic theoretical tenets of modern cosmology and explained why it is an utterly fraudulent science – precisely a “fake science” – even more so than its older sister physics.
In my series of theoretical articles on physics published in March and April this year,
I have already shown why the fundamental concept of dark matter in modern cosmology is one of the greatest blunders in science. Physicists have failed to understand their own definition of mass, which they use in all their other definitions and theoretical disquisitions, from a methodological and epistemological point of view. When properly interpreted it becomes obvious that the physical quantity “mass” is an energy relationship and not an intrinsic property of matter. As all systems of All-That-Is have energy, which is per definition the primary term of human consciousness for All-That-Is, all systems also have a mass. Period!