How Planck’s Time Resolves the Illusion of Linear Time

Georgi Stankov, July 1, 2016

This will be a very challenging reading. But when you approach it with your intuition and do not get intimidated by the scientific presentation below you will make a great leap in your cognitive understanding of the space-time concept and the illusion of linear time. This is what one should expect from an ascended master whose individual consciousness is now vibrating with 6D, 7D and even higher dimensions. For this reason I will also publish below a channelled message by the same source who recently channelled a message on Brexit. The same medium has received previous messages regarding the basic concepts of dimensions (designated as “d” in his terminology) and densities given as “D” which is a circumscription of the various levels of individual awareness. In fact when one reads his channellings one cannot escape the impression that both categories are defined in an almost identical manner so that the discrimination between dimensions and densities seems to be of redundant character. But I leave this conclusion to you.

I personally do not use the term “density” at all as it is very confusing. The reason for that is that the higher dimensions have a higher density of energy which makes them more fluid while the lower 2D (inorganic matter, minerals) and 3D dimensions (humans) have less energy per unit space, which is the current physical definition of lower density and that is why they appear to us more dense in terms of solid matter. However this kind of density is illusion of the human senses. Since we use all the time the term “dense reality” for the lower vibrating worlds and timelines it is advisable not to use this same term for the definition of dimensions or state of awareness as human language is very ambiguous and misunderstanding is pre-programmed.

The messages from this source can be read under this link:

I will publish the channeling on space-time (chapter 1.3) below and recommend you to read the whole book 2 as the messages are related. Here I will make a comprehensive reference to this message and explain it in the light of the new Theory of the Universal Law as summarized in volume II, chapter 9.7, page 368 on physics and cosmology (see below).

My recommendation is that you read first my explanation here, then read the channelled message from Zingdad, who is an astoundingly clear medium from South Africa, then read one more time my explanation here, and at the end read chapter 9.7 below dealing with the Big Bang hypothesis and its space-time parameters as they are currently described in the standard model of conventional cosmology.

It goes without saying that when I wrote this chapter in 1997 I had no clue about ascension and the nature of the multiverse as an assembly of infinite parallel timelines and how they relate to the parameters of the Big Bang. This I did much later and you can find quite a few articles on this website that discuss the cosmological constant Plank’s time, its interpretation and role in the ascension process. You can use the search button and /0r the log function to find these articles. Most of these publications are from 2011 and 2012 but I have discussed this topic marginally also in later articles.

Let us begin with the cosmological presentation of the aforementioned channel. According to this source the visible and accessible to human vision universe is a space-time torus:

“I’d like you to imagine a shape that is halfway between a donut and an apple. Like an apple it is more-or-less round. It is slightly flattened at the top and bottom where it dimples inwards. Like a donut there is a hole that goes right through where the apple core would be. But the difference is that the hole tapers from both the top and bottom so that it meets in the middle at a point.

And here is a picture of this torus as painted by the medium who was inspired by this higher dimensional source:

This is defined by this source as “Horn Torus” and this shape visualizes an image of the 4th dimension of the universe we currently inhabit: “The form of your universe is, at the 4th dimension, equivalent to the surface of a horn torus.” This image is a representation of all of space and time ever created in this 4D universe. The bright light at the centre of the torus is the universal singularity, where the event commonly known as the “Big Bang” in modern cosmology occurs.

All the energy that creates this universe comes from this central point which we describe as the Source and present-day cosmologists define as the “Big Bang”. It is emanated in one huge explosion and expands immensely following the form of the torus while cooling down and shaping into various forms of matter, such as galaxies, solar systems, planets, etc. This presentation is very similar to the idea of adiabatic expansion of the universe in the standard model of current cosmology, but this is the only similarity as the source and I shall explain in the following.

The horn torus is a closed energetic system. All the energy that comes from the top of the horn expands until it reaches the maximal equatorial expansion of the torus, also defined as event horizon and then begins to shrink towards the bottom of the horn until it reaches a maximal density and is fully absorbed by the central point of creation defined as the Big Bang. Cosmologists can currently assess with their telescopes only the expansion of our universe within its torus structure and this is the central point of departure for their hypothesis of the finite life of our universe that has allegedly begun with a Big Bang roughly 14 billions ago and is expanding and cooling (adiabatic expansion) ever since. They are incapable of observing the shrinking of the universe as it is beyond their event horizon. But of course there are fringe hypotheses within modern cosmology that suggest that a hypothetical shrinking of the universe is possible or even necessary from a theoretical point of view (so called steady-state hypotheses). I discuss in the chapter below and in volume II these concepts in detail and explain beyond any doubt based on novel mathematical calculations why the idea of endless expansion of the universe is nonsense.

My basic argument against this idea in the standard model of cosmology is that the Universal Law and all its concrete applications, which are well-known local laws in physics, show that energy = space-time of the visible Universe, including the much bigger invisible universe which we must postulate to exist, is a closed entity and follows the first thermodynamic law of conservation of energy. This is precisely what this source confirms and further elaborates on, of course within the cognitive limitations of the medium who is not a scientist but has developed a logical thinking that is open to new scientific ideas. This is what makes him a clear channel capable of presenting complex scientific content.

Essentially what this source says is that the “Big Bang” is at the same time the “Big Crunch”. This is not new to anybody who has dealt with the nature of black holes where it is postulated that behind every black hole there is a “white hole” that releases all the energy that has been sucked in by the black hole. This follows again from the ubiquitous validity of the law of conservation of energy which is an aspect of the Universal Law.

Because of the linear mindset of scientists, the observed expansion of the universe is considered in a linear fashion – as a historical event that has allegedly happened ca. 14 billion years ago and that since then the universe expands in an unabated manner. In fact, and here comes the new gnostic element of this message, the Big Bang and the Big Crunch happen in the Now, just as the expansion and contraction of this torus universe. This is the primordial idea of All-That-Is which I have developed and explained in numerous articles on this website from various angles. But here we concentrate on the cosmological discussion. This is how this source sums it up:

 “Energy constantly flows from the singularity and energy constantly returns. The Big Bang is right now. The Big Crunch is right now. But the wave your galaxy is surfing is between these two points.”

Based on this fundamental knowledge, space and time are an illusion of human linear thinking. This is a leitmotif in all our discussions on this website. I am the first scientist who has discovered the origin of this flawed linear mindset within current science. Essentially it begins with the foundation of geometry where time, being a fundamental parameter/ constituent of motion, is eliminated and only space is considered. Practically this is done by attributing the number 1 to the constituent space and then excluding it from all further mathematical equations. It is important to stress that all present-day theoreticians are unaware of this fundamental blunder which they perpetuate in an endless manner in science and thus reinforce the illusion of linear time and the existence of a static, spatial universe. In other words scientists eliminate Creation from their cosmological world view and this is the reason why this science must be replaced fully by the new Science and Gnosis of the Universal Law in the new 4D and 5D worlds.

This basic cognitive blunder is also the reason how and why the Euclidean space of geometry was first introduced in science and became the only reference system in physics and cosmology. All current scientific concepts are void of time as a parameter of motion – they are static, artificial geometric surrogates of the mind, with which scientists substitute real space-time which is a dynamic, ever-changing energetic entity. Please observe that Euclidean geometric space of classical mechanics, Minkovski space of Einsteins’s theory of relativity or any multidimensional tensor space used in modern physical models and string theories are empty per definition – they do not contain energy = space-time as a dynamic entity that is in a state of constant energy exchange and are thus inadequate means to assess the real universe that is constant, conscious creation.

This critics of traditional, deterministic science is a recurrent motif in all my books and articles. That is why the elimination of current science as an established world view is an indispensable prerequisite for the expansion of human awareness to 5D and our ascension to higher dimensions where the idea of linear time will be eliminated for ever. Please observe that I have proved that conventional time t is a pleonasm / synonym of space measured as distance s and is equivalent to reciprocal time/ frequency f: t ≈ s ≈ 1/f

This same basic conclusion is given by this source in a popular manner:

“But really, the first points that you can discover about space and time are already laid bare:

1. It’s all an illusion and doesn’t really exist.

2. If you create that you believe the illusion, then you can experience it to be real by being inside of the illusion.

3. Space and time, energy and matter are really “one thing”, although they appear to be separate and different things, and this is what creates the illusion.”

Then the source goes further to explain how this universe is created in the Now. It introduces the concept of “quantum flicker” which is popular circumscription of the basic fact that all systems and levels of All-That-Is are superimposed wave systems or vibrational systems. This holds true for all elementary particles as well as for all macroscopic systems of matter. The new theory of the Universal Law explains this fact thoroughly at the quantum level and at the macro level with respect to cosmology. The discussion below in chapter 9.7 deals precisely with this central issue. Please observe that the three Planck’s parameters with which the Big Bang is currently described in modern cosmology are based on fundamental constants of quantum physics. This is the unity of the micro and macro world as it meets in the Big Bang. For the medium this is new knowledge and this is how the source explains it to him before I give you my version:

“The answer to that comes down to a concept that I shall call “quantum flicker”. It really means that your universe is flickering in-and-out of existence at a very high rate. Take light as an example. When a photon travels through space it doesn’t do so smoothly. In this moment it exists here and then, in the next moment, it exists in its next position. It literally disappears from where it was, and then reappears, a little further forward. The gaps between its possible positions are very, very, very small. They are miniscule even compared to atomic particles. And the photon flickers along from position to position at an incredibly high rate. In fact, it flickers across these smallest of gaps at such an incredibly high rate that, in aggregate, it travels at light speed. Which, as you know, is quite a fast rate of travel.

So, “one moment” is the length of time (see Planck’s time below, note George) that a photon occupies one position before moving on to the next position. And that “space” that is occupied for one moment of time is the smallest possible unit of space (see Planck’s length below, note, George) that is still in three dimensions. This means you cannot discern, interact with or in any way measure anything shorter than that space. You also cannot discern, measure or in any other way interact with something that occurs for a time shorter than one moment.”

With this explanation the source refers indirectly to the Heisenberg uncertainty principle which deals in the first place with the limitations of human cognition by employing material instruments to explore 3D space-time. I have dedicated a lot of discussion to this key gnostic topic in all my books and many articles and will not delve into it here.

Finally the medium is told that the visible universe is not a solid entity but that it flickers each tredecillionth of a second which is one over 1042   – 1x1042 times each second.

This is exactly the Planck’s time of the Big Bang which I derive below from other known natural constants and explain for the first time in physics what it really means. Let me say in advance that when I wrote volume II in 1997 I had no clue about these gnostic aspects of the new theory of the Universal Law. Nonetheless my derivations below anticipated this knowledge and actually led to it several years later when I published in 2000 my first book on Gnosis “The Evolutionary Leap of Mankind“.

Essentially our visible universe is a vibrational system as is everything in All-That-Is and it flickers, i.e. it appears and extinguishes each tredecillionth of a second together with all photons that build its photon space-time from which matter is created in a secondary manner. This I have proved beyond any doubt by showing that all elementary particles are derived from the energy of the basic photon h (see Table 1 on “The Integration of Physics on a Single Page With the Help of the Universal Law”).

The idea that the universe is constantly created anew each tredecillionth of a second in the Now is so fundamental that I have discussed it on many occasions in the past. It is also our point of departure to understand why this universe is in fact a multiverse consisting of infinite parallel universes and alternative holographic models. I therefore recommend all my readers to use the search button with the key word “Planck’s time” without, and in association, with the word “144-grid” and find all the articles where I have discussed the ongoing constant creation of this universe and how it is affected by our personal creationary efforts. The channeling I am referring to below also deals with this topic and gives a congruent explanation which I will not discuss at this place as you have to read it in the original. Here is the explanation of this source as to why the Big Bang is happening in the Now and why everything we see has already existed when this universe was first created:

“To explain… let us go back to the very first moment when all that is in your universe was released from the singularity. In that moment there was a pulse of the maximum possible energy that could be released. That is to say, that particular time/space nexus was full with everything that it could contain. And it was as densely packed as it is possible for anything to be. That was the very first moment of your universe: everything that is, all compressed into one space. From this point there was only one possible thing for all that impossibly compressed “stuff” to do, and that was for it to expand outwards in the most violent explosion possible.

So the second moment in your universe contains all the energy that your universe now contains, just somewhat expanded one quantum flicker outwards when compared to the first moment.

The third moment in your universe contains all the energy that your universe now contains, just somewhat expanded another quantum flicker outwards when compared to the second moment.

And this is the process that has continued, moment after moment, right to the present moment where you now find yourself. Except, of course, tredecillions of moments are passing each second. But perhaps you begin to understand that, in any given moment, you can only see (or in any other way perceive) the energy that has come with your universe from that one first moment of the Big Bang.

Parallel and alternative timelines are created in the same manner. We as ascended masters in human gestalt have expanded hugely our propensity to bilocate rapidly on numerous timelines associated with the ascension version of Gaia. In this way we not only support the planetary ascension in a most effective manner, but we also create incessantly and almost instantaneously our reality according to our visions and desires. This is what many PAT members are now increasingly experiencing these days. Only that this blissful aspect of our new being as ascended masters is still negatively influenced by the ongoing physical pains that accompany us during our bilocations, to which this physical vessel is poorly adapted, and due to the still massive cleansing of numerous timelines, to which we have dedicated ourselves as a planetary ascension team.

And now enjoy the scientific presentation of the three Planck’s parameters of the Big Bang and in particular the derivation of Planck’s time which determines the tact of incessant creation in this multiverse as well as the popular, but scientifically very precise explanation of the basic structure and function of our 4D universe as a horn torus by this channelling source.


Volume II, page 368, chapter 9.7


When we extrapolate the hypothetical expansion of the universe in the past, we inevitably reach a point where the universe must be presented as a “space singularity“. This state of the universe is called “big bang“ in the standard model. In this space-less state, matter (energy) is believed to have been a homogeneous entity of extremely high density and temperature (see chapter 9.8).

One postulates in an a priori manner that during this initial phase of universal genesis only three natural constants have remained unchanged: the speed of light c, the gravitational constant G and Planck’s constant h (the basic photon). Modern cosmology gives no explanation for this subjective preference. We have already met a similar concept to the “big bang“ in classical mechanics – the mass point. While the mass point is an abstraction (object of thought) of real objects within geometry obtained by means of integration, the big bang is a mathematical abstraction of the whole. The prerequisite for this assumption is that space is empty and homogeneous.

This error is introduced in cosmology through Einstein‟s theory of relativity, but it goes back to Newton’s Euclidean space of classical mechanics, which Einstein failed to revise (see section 8.). The standard model results from physics’ genetic failure to define the primary term from an epistemological point of view. Although the “big bang“ is an object of thought and never existed, cosmologists earnestly believe that they can mathematically describe this condition by the so-called „Planck’s parameters“. This name stems from Planck’s equation, which is used for the derivation of these quantities.

The calculation of the hypothetical parameters of the “big bang“ is another outstanding flaw of cosmology of great didactic and historical value, comparable only to the medieval religious dogma postulating that the earth is flat and represents the centre of the universe. Before we discuss Planck’s parameters of the “big bang“, a few words on the history of the standard model. If we define Einstein as the “grandfather“ of modern cosmology, we should look upon de Sitter as the father of this discipline. The “Einstein-de Sitter universe“ is the first mathematical model of the universe that is still considered an adequate introduction to this discipline. While “Einstein’s universe“ is static, but contains matter (space-time relationships), “de Sitter’s universe“ is dynamic, but completely empty. This is, at least, Eddington’s interpretation of these models.

The “Einstein-de Sitter universe“ became famous because it implied the “big bang“ as the moment of genesis. The term “big bang“ was established only in 1950, when Fred Boyle mentioned it for the first time in a publication. The scientific penetration of this model began, however, ten years earlier and gained momentum in the sixties. The Russian scientist Friedmann was the first to introduce the idea of an expanding universe in his mathematical model (1922). Departing from the theory of relativity, he destroyed Einstein’s hopes of establishing a single irrevocable model of the universe. Instead, Friedmann presented three possible solutions (objects of thought), depending on the magnitude of the quantities (density) used (see chapter 9.3).

As his work remained unnoticed during the Russian civil war, the Belgian priest Lemaître was the first to popularize this concept in the West. The pre-war heritage of cosmological ideas in physics was further developed by Gamov, a student of Friedmann, under more favourable conditions after the war. He was the actual father of the standard model. The explosion of modern cosmology began in the seventies, and the diversity of conflicting ideas born in this period reached a state of inflation in the eighties. The nineties can be characterized as a period of prolonged stagnation that has been abruptly terminated by the discovery of the Universal Law. This is the short and not so glamorous history of this new physical discipline.

The three Planck‟s parameters, which are believed to assess precisely the initial conditions of the universe, are: Planck’s mass, Planck’s time and Planck’s length. As we see, cosmologists have also recognized the simple fact that the only thing, they can do, is to measure the time, space, or space-time relationships of the systems – be they real or fictional. The theoretical approach to the “big bang parameters“ departs from Heisenberg uncertainty principle, that is, it departs from the basic photon h, as discussed at length in chapter 7.3. The basic photon with the mass mp can be regarded as the elementary momentum of the universe:

p = mpc = 2.21×10-42  kgms-1 (equation 247)

The mass of the basic photon is calculated by applying the axiom of conservation of action potentials, for instance, for its energy interaction with the electron as measured by the Compton-scattering: EA,e =mec lc,e = h = mpc lA; hence:

mp = h / c² = h / clA (248)

In cosmology, the axiom of conservation of action potentials is applied for the fictive interaction between the basic photon h and the hypothetical big bang, where the latter is regarded as another action potential: EA,big-bang = mplc lc = h = mpclA. From this, the Planck’s mass mpl of the big bang is determined according to equation (248):

mpl = h/clc = mpclA / clc (249)

Cosmology gives absolute no explanation as to why this equivalence has been chosen for the determination of the abstract quantity “Planck‟s mass“. Therefore, equation (249) should be considered a subconscious, irrational application of the axiom of conservation of action potentials. The wavelength lc from equation (249) is defined as Planck’s length of the “big bang“: lpl = lc= [1d-space]. For this reason we can also call it the “Compton wavelength“ of the “big bang“, analogously with the Compton wavelengths of the elementary particles. In the light of the new axiomatics, it is a one-dimensional space quantity of the hypothetical space of the “big bang“:

lpl = lc = [1d-space] of the hypothetical “big bang“ (250)

The above equations demonstrate that the description of the space-time of the hypothetical “big bang“ departs intuitively from the correct notion of the Universal Law. It is the origin of all scientific ideas, whereas all basic ideas in science are of mathematical origin. However, the interpretation of such mathematical ideas at the rational level is full of logical flaws that vitiate all systems of science which have been developed so far.

Planck‟s mass mpl in equation (249) can be calculated only after Planck’s length lc of the “big bang“ is known. What is the traditional approach of modern cosmology to this problem? As expected, it departs from the event horizon l of the “big bang“ as the structural complexity Ks of this system. In this sense, Planck’s length lpl = lc and the event horizon, expressed as radius, are set equivalent (definition within mathematical formalism):

l = lpl = lc (251)

The event horizon l of the “big bang“ is calculated by applying the same derivation of the universal equation as used for the Schwarzschild radius: Rs /2 = GM/c² (see equation (245)):

l = GmPl/c² (252)

In chapter 9.6, we have shown that this application of the universal equation assesses the absolute coefficients of the vertical energy exchange between individual gravitational systems of matter and photon space-time. In this sense, the “big bang“ is regarded as a hypothetical system of matter. This is in an apparent contradiction to the standard model which considers the “big bang“ as a state of condensed homogeneous radiation. According to this model, matter has evolved at a later stage. From the above equations, we can derive the Planck’s length:

 (lPl)²= lc² = Gh/c³ (253)

Some authors prefer to use h/2p instead of h. This is their degree of mathematical freedom. In this case, the value of the Planck‟s length is 2p times smaller than in equation (253). The method of measurement of this space quantity is irrelevant from a cognitive point of view as the “big bang“ has never existed – it is a mathematical fiction, an object of thought, created by cosmologists.

Equation (253) contains the three natural constants, c, G, and h, that have been postulated to hold in the “big bang“. This is a vicious circle – it is a posterior adaptation (manipulation) of the physical world to comply with their mathematical derivation (after all, cosmologists have to perform some derivations and, to do this, they need certain natural constants.). This approach, defined as “fraud“ in science, is not so seldom as is generally believed (212).

The three constants assess the space-time of the photon level, which itself is determined by the space-time characteristics of gravitational matter. This basic proof for the closed character of space-time will be presented in chapter 9.9. We shall show below that the properties of photon space-time as assessed by the magnetic field length lmo (equation (110)) and the electric acceleration or field Eo (equation (109)) of photon space-time, from which the speed of light is obtained in Maxwell’s equation c² = lmoEo (105), depend on the average rotational characteristics of the gravitational systems in the universe, such as black holes, quasars, pulsars, neutron stars etc. This is a consequence of the vertical energy exchange between matter and photon space-time and a fundamental proof that space-time is a closed entity of open interacting U-subsets.

According to the standard model, these gravitational systems were not developed in the initial phase of the universe. They have emerged at a much later stage, during the epoch of hadrons (see Table 9-1). This would mean that these celestial objects, which are believed to be a late product of the alleged genesis of the universe, have already determined the three natural constants, c, G, and h, that existed in this form during the “big bang“. This proof illustrates again the absurdity of the standard model. It is cogent that there is not a single statement of the standard model that is true.

This model is, indeed, the greatest intellectual calamity in the history of physics. Equation (253) can be solved for the universal gravitational potential: EAU = c³ /G (equation (30)). When we set the reciprocal of this action potential 1/EAU = G/c³ in (253), we obtain for Planck’s length the following remarkable equation:

 lpl = Gh/c³ = h/EAU  = 4,05.10-35 m (254)

According to modern cosmology, Planck‟s length is the square root of the quotient of the two fundamental action potentials of space-time: the basic photon h, which is the smallest (elementary) action potential we know of, and the universal action potential EAU, which is the aggregated product of all underlying action potentials with respect to the surrogate SI unit of absolute time (= frequency) 1 s -1 . We can derive from h the space-time of all elementary particles (see Table 1) and from EAU – the space-time of the visible universe. Thus Planck’s length is a quotient (relationship) of the [1d-space]-quantities of the smallest and the biggest action potential of the universe with respect to the SI unit 1 second (building of equivalence) according to principle of circular argument:

lpl = √h/EAU = SP(A) (255)

In equation (255), the time of the basic photon is set equivalent to the time of the universal action potential per definition with respect to the SI system: fh = fEAU =1s -1= SP(A)=1 unit = certain event. Equation (255) by no means confirms the existence of the “big bang“, but simply illustrates the ubiquitous validity of the principle of circular argument as a method of definition and measurement of physical quantities.

Indeed, it is impossible to perceive why the comparison of the smallest and the biggest action potential of space-time should be a proof for the existence of the “big bang“. Both action potentials are products of constant space-time as observed today and none of them could have existed in the space-singularity of the big bang. This is cogent when the space magnitudes of the two potentials are compared with the magnitude of Planck‟s length of the hypothetical “big bang“. We leave the proof of their incommensurability as an exercise for the reader.

The above derivations of Planck‟s parameters within the new axiomatics of the Universal Law illuminate the entire nonsense of the standard model. They explain the background of the epistemological flaws in cosmology. The universal action potential EAU tells us that, every second, the mass (space-time relationship) of M = 4,038.1035 kg is exchanged between matter and photon space-time. If photon space-time is regarded as empty, massless, homogeneous space or vacuum, as is done in cosmology today, then it is quite logical to neglect the energy exchange from photon space-time to matter and to consider only the energy exchange from matter to photon space-time. This energy exchange is associated with space expansion.

If at the same time, the finite lifetimes of stars are neglected, that is, their energy exchange with photon space-time, for instance, the transformation of space and matter into energy at the event horizon of black holes is not considered, the only possibility of explaining this fictional expansion is to assume that the universe has been subjected to an adiabatic expansion from its very beginning. However, it remains a mystery where the space that fills the gaps between the escaping galaxies comes from. Although this question is obvious in terms of common sense, it is not posed in modern physics. This is another typical example of the self-inflicted cognitive misery of modern cosmology.

The linear extrapolation of this hypothetical adiabatic expansion of the universe in the past ends inevitably with a space-less point, the “big bang“ (the name is of no importance), where all known physical laws as determined today lose their validity. At least, this is what physicists make us believe at present. While this moment of “virtual genesis“ may suit some popular religious beliefs, it has nothing to do with an objective science that should understand the object of its study.

Once Planck‟s length is computed, one can quite easily determine any other quantity of the hypothetical “big bang“, because the universal equation is a rule of three. For instance, we obtain the following value for Planck’s mass:

mpl = h/clPl = 5.5×10-8 kg (256)

The same results is obtained when the mass mp of the basic photon is used:

mpl = mplA/lPl =  5.5×10high(-8) kg (257)

Equation (257) demonstrates that the basic photon is the universal reference system of physics according to the principle of circular argument. From Planck‟s length, one can easily obtain the hypothetical magnitude of the second constituent – Planck’s time tpl:

tpl = lpl /c = 0.135x10-42 s (258)

According to modern cosmology, the three Planck‟s parameters completely describe the “big bang“. It maintains that all physical laws have “lost their validity“ in this hypothetical state, except the three constants, c, G, and h, with the help of which Planck‟s parameters of the “big bang“ are computed. However, we have shown that all known natural and physical laws can be derived from each other, or more precisely, from the constants of photon space-time: c, G and h. Therefore, we must conclude that all laws were valid in the “big bang“. The only possible consequence of this conclusion is that there has been no “big bang“ – this event has only occurred in the mathematical phantasy of cosmologists. What is the view of modern cosmology on this issue? If we try to learn more about this exotic, initial phase of the universe, we are consoled by such sibylline statements (213):

“The relativistic space-time (of the big bang) is then no longer a continuum, and we even need a new theory of gravitation – of quantum gravitation or super-gravitation.“

Considering the fact that physics has no theory of gravitation, it sounds rather strange to demand a new theory of “quantum gravitation“ or “supergravitation“, whatever that means. Isn’t it much simpler to discard the standard model, as has been done in this section? In order to complete our analysis, we shall finally scrutinize the concept of adiabatic expansion of the universe as a complimentary aspect of the “big bang“-hypothesis.


212. S. Lock & F. Wells, Fraud and Misconduct in Medical Research, BMJ Publishing Group, 1993, London.

213. PA Tipler, p. 1478, German ed.


Space and Time

channelled by Zingdad

Z: Oooookay!  So, 8, I feel as if I have finally readied myself and my mind to have a conversation, for which we have, quite literally, been waiting years.

8: It’s true! So much time has passed since you first realised you wanted to talk about time. And it’s going to be a truly fascinating conversation – a conversation of many delightful parts with numerous fun twists and turns.

But now, given that you have already waited SO long for this conversation, perhaps you will humour me and allow me a small tangent before we begin?

Z: Of course…

8: As we sit down to write this together, you have just concluded a time of the year known as the “festive season”. So, I would like to ask you first about this fellow Santa Claus who seems to make such an impact in many parts of the world.

Z: I… uh… Santa?

8: Yes. Could you describe him to me, please?

Z: Sure. I’m not sure where this is going but… sure. He’s known by different names in different parts of the world. Here in South Africa as children we called him Father Christmas, for example. But it doesn’t matter what he’s called, Santa Claus is a large, rotund, jolly old guy who wears a red outfit with white fur trim. He is known for making a big belly-laugh as he distributes gifts to children all over the world. He has a sleigh pulled by magical reindeer and…

8: … okay, yes, thank you. You are aware, of course, that you are describing a fictional character to me, aren’t you?

Z: Of course (I laugh), that goes without saying!

8: So, you can describe a person who doesn’t really exist. You can describe him in detail as if you have known him personally. And people all over the world, even people in far distant countries who speak entirely different languages, will also know of this fellow and describe him, his personality, his activities, his nature and his function in the world in very, very similar terms to what you would.  Am I right?

Z: Yes. I believe so.

8: It doesn’t matter that he is a fiction. He is still understood the same by many people.  But equally, there are people on the planet who know nothing of him at all.

It’s superfluous to my needs to get into the complex relationship between the celebration of the birth of the Christ and the ancient pagan celebration of Yule and this jolly fellow who comes bearing gifts wearing clothing, the colour scheme of which is provided by a corporation that produces beverages. Suffice it to say that there are cultures on planet earth right now that do mark this celebration, cultures that do not mark this celebration and then there are even some small, remote cultures that are utterly unaware of it.

Z: Right. But what does dear ol’ Santa have to do with “time and space”?

8: We’re just about to get there!

Imagine for a moment what it would be like if your belief in Santa made him real. I mean really real. If you believe in him then, like so many children the world over: he is real for you. But the difference in this imaginary scenario is that, if you believe in Santa, his existence will stand up to careful scrutiny! If you believe in him then you see him… then you can travel to the North Pole and visit his workshop. And, if you are observant, you can see his sleigh whizzing by in the night sky on Christmas Eve, dropping off prezzies for all those believers who were “good” that year.

But of course there will also be those who don’t believe in his existence. For them there is no Santa whatsoever. He simply doesn’t exist and there is no evidence to gainsay their disbelief.

Can you see that these two groups of people cannot inhabit the same world?

There must be one reality for Santa believers and another for disbelievers. Quite simply, you cannot have a world in which they co-exist, because in the one reality there is empirical evidence for Santa and in the other it is totally absent. So these are different realities.

And “Space and Time” is a lot like that.  You see, “time” is one attribute of the 4th dimension of reality. “Space” is another. If you really, really believe in this little fictional tale called “space and time”, then you can come to live in a reality in which it appears to be absolutely real. When asked, pretty much everyone who believes in “space and time” will describe it in the same kinds of terms. You’ll agree it is real and you’ll all be able to describe your own personal experience of it. There is clear empirical evidence for it and you can study it. And so it is that you are inside the reality of the believers. Only this time you are believers in space and time.

All of the above is really just my way of explaining to you that “space and time” are the same thing, that they are fictional and that they are consensus reality constructs. They are only real for you if you agree that they are real. But if you DO agree that they are real, then there is empirical evidence to show that it is so. And it’s very hard to argue against empirical evidence! So it’s almost as if they are real!

Z: “Almost”?

8: Yes. All illusions can be made to break down if you know where to look. And we will, in the discussions that follow, find some of those “frilly edges” where the illusion breaks down. But, for the main part, just as with your description of Santa, I will be describing the illusion to you: what it is and how it works. Even though I do not live inside the illusion, I am like a person from the world of disbelievers who knows a great deal about Santa and the world of believers. So I can tell you about it from the outside, looking in.

Z: Okay!  That sounds good. So where do we start?

The Torus of Space and Time

8: With a shape. Can you picture a torus?

Z: Yes. A donut-shape is called a torus.

8: That’s one kind of torus. I’d like you to imagine a shape that is halfway between a donut and an apple. Like an apple it is more-or-less round. It is slightly flattened at the top and bottom where it dimples inwards. Like a donut there is a hole that goes right through where the apple core would be. But the difference is that the hole tapers from both the top and bottom so that it meets in the middle at a point.

Z: Yes, I can imagine that.

8: Good. For what it’s worth, this is called a Horn Torus. And if you can imagine such a shape, then you are holding in your mind an image of the 4th dimension of the universe you currently inhabit.

The form of your universe is, at the 4th dimension, equivalent to the surface of a horn torus.

Perhaps this seems like a purely academic thought, but it has some striking implications that will actually give you access to insight and answers to some of the fundamental conundrums with which cosmologists at this point are still wrestling.

The difficulty that arises for anyone on earth that would ponder the nature of your universe is that you are 3-dimensional beings, living in, what appears to be, a 3-dimensional universe. It is nearly impossible for you to discern the form and nature of the 4th dimension and beyond. But coming to these understandings is what will allow you to begin to understand your own true nature and your place in creation. And that is what we will be doing in this conversation.

Z: Wow, okay! I look forward to having you explain that!

8: Good. But before we proceed, I want to make sure that everyone who reads this is on the same page with us, as regards this very special shape. So I am going to place an image in your mind and ask you, please, to find a way to draw that for our readers.

Z: Okay (I get the image), got it. That shouldn’t be too hard… (I go away and do some graphics work and then…).

Okay… what do you think of this?

The 4D Universe as a horn torus

8: Not a bad job at all. So, what you have there is a 2-dimensional picture showing a 3-dimensional object that represents a 4-dimensional surface.  So it’s a nice picture, but please understand: it’s just a representation. The trick is to extract the understandings implicit in that representation without getting too attached to the universe actually looking like that from your 3-dimensional perspective.

Z: Okay. So, 8, if I understand you correctly then you are saying that the 4th dimensional form of the universe is represented by the surface of this torus. How so?

8: Yes. Let’s get into that. The first thing to be aware of, when looking at that image, is that you are looking at a representation of all of space and time right there in front of you. If you look at a normal map you look at a representation of a piece of land, right? Well imagine you could see a map that showed you that piece of land from the beginning of time to the end. Now imagine you can look at a map that shows you the whole universe for all of time. That is what you are looking at when you look at this illustration all of space and all of time represented in one picture.

If you travel inside the 4th dimension, as you currently are, you do so in a time-like fashion. The easiest way for me to explain that concept is to begin with the bright light at the centre of the torus. See that? That is the universal singularity and is also where the event commonly known as the “Big Bang” occurs.

Let’s begin there.

At the beginning of time a vast quantity of energy is expressed at the Big Bang. From there, the energy expands into the funnel “above” or “after” (depending on your perspective) the singularity. As it expands, so the energy cools and condenses into less energetic states. It becomes matter. Space and time are already there. The form of the horn torus is already there. The energy of the matter is simply travelling across it.

There is more expansion and more cooling. And in this matrix of super-excited proto-matter, beings come and play. Perhaps you’d call them creator-beings. In a way they are like children playing in a stream of water (and they don’t mind me saying so either). They make patterns in the stream and watch as those patterns play out, spinning and whirling away, as the energy and matter continues to expand.  And, from here on out, the story gets more and more complex. Too complex to tell of today. The basic point is that there are more and more consciousnesses that come to play and to make and hold patterns in the energy, at every level of scale. Very early on, at the smallest scales, the energy is knit into sub-atomic particles. And then atoms and later molecules. At a larger scale the expanding gasses are given twists and swirls and, as a consequence of these playing consciousnesses, proto-galaxies begin to form. And then, later, as those galaxies take shape, stars and planets are spun together inside those young galaxies.

And so, as the matter and energy of the universe begins to exit the horn at the top of the torus, it is already quite cool and there are many very well-defined structures knit out of the available energy. And so it is that, at this point, you will find well-defined galaxies including discrete young suns and planets spinning and cycling like wheels within wheels as a consequence of the games of those creative consciousnesses.

From here the expansion continues. Energy expands and matter moves further apart. Stars and galaxies move further and further from each other, seemingly rushing away from each other into an ever-expanding night. And from where you are right now inside this time-like progression it certainly might seem as if they will continue to expand eternally outward, as the expansion seems to just go faster and faster.

But, if one steps outside of the bubble of space and time, one can see that there is an equatorial high-point to all of this. Things only expand so far before they begin to contract. And then the matter and energy of the universe moves back towards singularity. As it does, it goes faster and faster. Galaxies begin to draw together. Space begins to shrink. And, at last, as the matter and energy of the universe begins to rush towards itself, it begins to heat up as it compacts again. As the matter of the universe rushes towards itself it begins to collide. Large objects are smashed together and broken into smaller objects. Molecular chains are broken. Then atoms are smashed into a super-hot soup of sub-atomic particles, then pure energy and then… singularity. The Big Crunch. At this point time slows down to a dead halt. All time is now. All space is here. All matter is energy and all energy is one energy. All is One. Singularity!

Z: Wow. That’s so elegant. I love it!

8: It is per force a huge over-simplification of events, but it does at least give you an overview from which we can work.

Z: There is something I don’t quite understand though.  The first half of the journey is expansive from the Big Bang… and then the second half is contractive, ending in the Big Crunch.  But you just said it appears to us as if we keep expanding. Can you clarify that?

8: A good, observant question. It comes down to two reasons, both of which have already been covered. The first reason is that you can only see “backwards in time”. You can only see things the way they were.  So, as you reach the equatorial high-point of the torus, you can still only see the way things were. And since it is the objects that are the furthest away that most powerfully show you how objects in the universe move, relative to your position, you will still see everything moving away from where you are. It will continue to look this way for a good while yet. In a few years time it might become possible to discern the changing tide but only to those that are specifically looking for this with the most sensitive of equipment. It will take perhaps centuries before astronomers will see a mix of expansive and contractive signatures in the sky. And it will only be as one enters the Big Crunch itself that an observer would be able to observe no evidence of expansion in the sky at all.

So that’s the first reason.

The second reason is, as explained, movement does not slow down. At the Big Bang, the stuff of the universe is ejected. It is flung outwards with a great deal of force. Things move apart. Then, at some point, those things are pulled towards each other by the contractive forces. If you look at the torus and imagine stars and galaxies moving over its surface, perhaps you can see why there does not have to be a deceleration for this to happen. And so, as astronomers examine the cosmos they notice that the objects of the universe are not slowing in their movement. Couple this with the fact that you are seeing the light of times gone past and logic would seem to dictate that the universe will forever expand. Though this is, of course, not the case.

Z: And, the other thing is, the way you described the movement across the torus, there seems to be a beginning and an end. But there isn’t really one, is there?  It just goes on and on.

8: Very perceptive. Energy constantly flows from the singularity and energy constantly returns. The Big Bang is right now. The Big Crunch is right now. But the wave your galaxy is surfing is between these two points.

But really, the first points that you can discover about space and time are already laid bare:

1. It’s all an illusion and doesn’t really exist.

2. If you create that you believe the illusion, then you can experience it to be real by being inside of the illusion.

3. Space and time, energy and matter are really “one thing”, although they appear to be separate and different things, and this is what creates the illusion.

Z: Okay, great. But I have some questions.

8: I’m shocked (he jokes). The aforementioned was really only meant to be an introductory framework. There is MUCH more to be said on the subject and this will come from your questions. So, go ahead, let’s hear them…

Can We Distinguish the Horn Torus for Ourselves?

Z: Well, the first thing that comes to mind is: looking at that shape – that horn torus – is it possible for us to discern that shape with instruments, such as telescopes or whatever? I guess what I am asking is, whether we, inside of the illusion, can find a way to see that torus for ourselves?

8: No. The best you can do is to infer its existence. The torus is the shape of the flow of time itself. You experience yourself to be living through moments of time. You can only perceive one “slice” of that shape at a time and, as such, would not normally be able to perceive the entire shape.

To facilitate your understanding of this I am going to remind you of an old friend. Remember Shadowman?

Z: Yes, the flat guy from the discussion on dimensions (Zingdad note: see Chapter 1.1 Dimensions).

8: Right. Well the thing is that he is a 2D being and, as such, cannot perceive depth. He would have profound difficulty even imagining things that are not flat as he is. Even though he is in a room that HAS depth, he can’t perceive that. He cannot perceive the shape of anything at all other than other 2D things, and they even have to be on the same plane as he is before he becomes aware of them. But, if he is a bit of a thinker, there might be ways for him to use what he can perceive of his world to hypothesise the 3rd dimension. And that is exactly what we are doing here – finding ways for you, a 3rd dimensional being to understand the 4th dimension. You are inside a space that has four dimensions, but you can only perceive that indirectly. You are in a shape that you cannot see. You experience it only by travelling through it and you struggle to make sense of this travel.

And so, to come back to your question: I’m afraid no telescope of any kind will allow you to perceive the horn torus.  To do so, one would have to be able to see outside of time. Telescopes can, of course, not do this. Telescopes of all kinds appear to be able to look “outwards” – they appear to be able to look across great distances. But that is an illusion. What they are doing is powerfully magnifying a very small, dim portion of what is available right here and right now. It is a function of the illusion of the flow of time that telescopes therefore can only look in one direction… and that is backwards in time.

Z: Okay, so we won’t see the torus with a telescope. But you said something interesting there. What do you mean when you say it appears as if we can only see backwards in time with a telescope?

8: Oh come on! You know this!

Telescopes do not “look outwards”. All they do is concentrate and focus the light that falls upon them. But that light has had to travel some distance to get to the telescope. The very nearest star to your solar system is about 4¼ light years away. In other words it has taken more than four years for the light that shines from that star to reach earth. If you look at Proxima Centauri (the name that star has been given) then you are seeing the star as it was more than four years ago. You are looking into the past. And Proxima Centauri is your nearest star with the shortest transit time. Even with the naked eye you can see stars that are thousands of light years away and galaxies that are millions of light years away (though at such distances they appear to be a single spot of light). So, even with the naked eye, when you look out, you are looking back in time.

With the most advanced telescopes you are able to see some of the earliest galaxies more than 13 billion light years away. If you wish to “see” much further back in time, you will need to look more for energy signatures and less for stars and galaxies. And it is so that there are those scientists who focus on this area of endeavour and they are indeed picking up energetic particles and electromagnetic radiations from the expansion of the singularity nearly 14 billion light years back.

At the risk of belabouring the point… they are not seeing the singularity as it now exists. To do that you would have to be able to see outside of time and that is not possible for you. They are seeing it as it was nearly 14 billion light years back.

Z: Which means it was 14 billion years ago?

8: No, not quite. Light years are a measure of distance. Years are a measure of time from your relative perspective. It would be nice if they equated directly, but they only are not actually the same thing. I am trying to be accurate without confusing you with too much detail. If you like we can address the idea of “relative time” later. It’s really quite interesting but it will take a little work for you to understand. So for now this will have to do: when you look out into the night sky, and particularly when you look with a telescope, you are looking at events in the distant past.

Z: But you said that this was actually an illusion?

8: Indeed. You seem to be seeing backwards in time. But that is a function of the way you are travelling across the surface of the torus. The effect of that travel is the appearance of the march of time. Time does not really exist. It is just movement in the 4th dimension.

The concept I am getting to here is much more far-reaching than a simple understanding of what you are seeing through a telescope, though. So I’d like to take a little time to explain it properly.

The Universal NOW

All the matter, energy and light that you are able to perceive (directly or indirectly) is exactly the same age. Everything, from the matter in your own body, to the light that comes from the most distant of galaxies, was all expelled in the same moment from the singularity. You can only see (or in any other ways perceive) matter, energy or light that was expressed from the singularity at the exact moment that the matter that makes up your body was expressed.

Z: I don’t get that.

8: Stay with me. This is quite interesting and quite important. When you get what I am trying to tell you, you’ll understand something quite fundamental to the concept of space and time being the same thing.

The easiest is for me to give you another image; a very small variation of the first one. Here we go…

Z: (I get the image and draw it). Okay… How’s this:

8: Yes, that’s the idea. Now here is where it gets interesting. One of those lines – the one around the middle of the torus – represents the whole of the universe that you can interact with right now. Everything that you can see, or in any other way experience in each moment, is inside that one line. That line is one moment thick. And when you consider that a moment is one flicker of time and that each flicker is many trillionths of a second in duration, then you understand that this line is very, very, very thin indeed. And every single thing that exists within your universe is inside that line.

Z: There is a line just trillionths of a second thick and the whole observable universe exists inside it?!?

8: From the 4D perspective, yes, that is so. The universe you inhabit started out as a pulse of energy some 14 billion light years back at the singularity. It all started as a single point. Then, with its first moment of expansion, it became, on our horn torus, a very, very small little circular line around the inside of the horn. As the universe has expanded, so the circle has expanded; growing bigger and moving up the horn of the torus. The rate of expansion has been steadily increasing and so the circle has been getting bigger and bigger, faster and faster.

Z: Okay but… whew!… so many questions…

8: One at a time. Take as long as you need. You will understand this soon enough.

Z: Alright. First question: How can our whole universe exist inside that one very thin line? I mean, our universe is billions of years old. What does it mean that it’s inside a line trillionths of a second thick? And why is it that thickness? Why not ten minutes thick or a day thick? And also…

8: Wait, wait. Don’t overload the questions. Let’s start with the thickness of the line. You are a single-perspective being, right? What I mean is that the way you are experiencing yourself right now is that you can only observe one moment at a time. You cannot be here now, and also, at the same time, yesterday and also last year and also in another incarnation.

Z: Yes. Right. I do hope to become multidimensional in my scope but…

8: Yes, yes. Let’s stay focused. You can only observe one moment at a time; this is the point. This is so for everyone incarnated on earth. It’s how it is when you inhabit the 3rd dimension.

So you can only observe this moment. But what is this moment? What does “moment” even mean?

The answer to that comes down to a concept that I shall call “quantum flicker”. It really means that your universe is flickering in-and-out of existence at a very high rate. Take light as an example. When a photon travels through space it doesn’t do so smoothly. In this moment it exists here and then, in the next moment, it exists in its next position. It literally disappears from where it was, and then reappears, a little further forward. The gaps between its possible positions are very, very, very small. They are miniscule even compared to atomic particles. And the photon flickers along from position to position at an incredibly high rate. In fact, it flickers across these smallest of gaps at such an incredibly high rate that, in aggregate, it travels at light speed. Which, as you know, is quite a fast rate of travel.

So, “one moment” is the length of time that a photon occupies one position before moving on to the next position. And that “space” that is occupied for one moment of time is the smallest possible unit of space that is still in three dimensions. This means you cannot discern, interact with or in any way measure anything shorter than that space. You also cannot discern, measure or in any other way interact with something that occurs for a time shorter than one moment.

Z: And each moment is many trillionths of a second in duration? EXACTLY how many trillionths?

8: Ah! I was somewhat hoping you wouldn’t ask for that level of accuracy. The actual number is quite large. I can’t find the word for it in your mind, the biggest number I could find with a name was “trillion”. And a trillion is a one with 12 zeros. Like this: 1,000,000,000,000.  And a trillionth is its fraction: one over a trillion.

Well the actual number we are looking for is a much, much smaller fraction 1 over a number with more than 40 zeroes.

Z: Hm. More than 40 zeros. Shorter than 1/10,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000ths of a second?

(I take a short break and do some research on the ‘net)

Apparently there are words for these really big numbers. A tredecillionth is one over 1042. So is it fair to say that a moment is about a tredecillionth of a second long?

8: Hm. Very approximately, yes. There is no way for me to give you the precise number without running afoul of the Law of Free Will.  If I try, we will end up muddling it with false information.

Z: Ahh… So this would be a “law of confusion” moment, as described to me by J-D in the early chapters of Book 1?

8: Exactly so. I’m pleased you remembered. Let me explain for those who don’t remember what that was about:

There is a fairly simple calculation that can be done to find out exactly how short this quantum flicker is, but there is no way for you to have the coefficients for that calculation in your mind. If I gave you that number, and it was later corroborated by someone who did manage to gain access to the correct information, then this would collapse your (and others’) free will right to doubt. It would make this little treatise “undoubtable truth”. Which it can’t be. It is, of course, just a perspective.

Z: I understand. Perhaps I could find some mathematician / scientist to work with on this to get that exact number?

8: Sure. If it is that important to you. But you’d have to find someone with good knowledge of these things who is also an unorthodox thinker. These ideas that I am sharing with you are, of course, not necessarily in alignment with the current conventional scientific view. Fortunately theoretical physicists are, as a group, fairly adventurous in their thinking, so perhaps you will find such a person to work with if that is your desire (This is, of course, a gross exaggeration, but I received similar messages from the HR when I still believed that there were scientists on this planet who are capable of grasping my argumentation in volume II on the new physical theory of the Universal Law. Note, George)

But back to the subject at hand. Do you now understand why a moment is approximately just tredecillionths of a second long?

Z: Yes. I think I get that, but what I still don’t understand is why you say the line on the torus of “all that we can perceive” is just one moment thick. I mean; let’s say I could get a telescope powerful enough that I could look at the first light that came from the Big Bang. Would I not be looking back 14 billion years into the past? Is the line not then 14 billion years thick?

8: I love the way you are thinking about this and I enjoy your reasoning but, unfortunately no, that is not correct.

To explain… let us go back to the very first moment when all that is in your universe was released from the singularity. In that moment there was a pulse of the maximum possible energy that could be released. That is to say, that particular time/space nexus was full with everything that it could contain. And it was as densely packed as it is possible for anything to be. That was the very first moment of your universe: everything that is, all compressed into one space. From this point there was only one possible thing for all that impossibly compressed “stuff” to do, and that was for it to expand outwards in the most violent explosion possible.

So the second moment in your universe contains all the energy that your universe now contains, just somewhat expanded one quantum flicker outwards when compared to the first moment.

The third moment in your universe contains all the energy that your universe now contains, just somewhat expanded another quantum flicker outwards when compared to the second moment.

And this is the process that has continued, moment after moment, right to the present moment where you now find yourself. Except, of course, tredecillions of moments are passing each second. But perhaps you begin to understand that, in any given moment, you can only see (or in any other way perceive) the energy that has come with your universe from that one first moment of the Big Bang. Some percentage of that energy has condensed into matter; some of it is available as light; but irrespective of the form the energy takes, it remains so that you can only perceive the energy that was born in the one same moment in which the matter of your body was also born.

You ask about looking with a telescope. Well, it doesn’t matter whether you look with your eyes, a telescope or some even more sensitive device; the principle remains the same: you are seeing the light that is here now. It might have travelled a great distance to get to you now, and therefore have originated a very long time ago, but you are only actually seeing now.

If you pick up on the radiations from some of the early reactions following the Big Bang, then you are not seeing the Big Bang itself, you are seeing the echoes and reverberations thereof that still persist and are falling on your telescope (or your cosmic microwave detector, more likely) in this moment now.

Z: My brain feels a bit over-heated but I think I actually do understand that.

So, wow, our whole three-dimensional universe exists from the beginning of the Big Bang to the end of the Big Crunch as a line, just one moment thick, travelling across the surface of this horned torus in the 4th Dimension.

The Eternal Om and Alternate Time Lines

8: Yes. And your experience of that travelling line is the process of time.

You can imagine that moving line as a pulse, or perhaps a drum beat. In a manner very similar to a sound wave, a wave is set up at the Big Bang and that wave propagates outwards across the surface of the torus before collapsing again at the Big Crunch. That wave is your whole 3-dimensional universe and the movement across the surface of the torus is the change of time.

Now let’s have some fun.

That wave is of course not the only wave. If your wave is one drum beat, then there are many, many, many more. In fact the whole of the surface of the torus is evenly covered with a non-stop succession of waves.

And just as it is with sound, a single beat is just that: one beat, but many beats in quick succession is a tone. And so it can very accurately be said that the whole of this creation – all the universes all taken together – are a resonant harmonic tone.

As you no doubt know there is a tradition in some of the most ancient Eastern religions to meditate on the sound “Om”, or as it is more correctly rendered, “Aum”. Well, what you perhaps did not know is that this is so because they believe that creation began with The One creating form (the universe) with the vibration of this sound: “Aum”. They believe that, before this sound, there was the potentiality for everything but nothing was manifest. And then “Aum!” and with this sound, they say, God took form. The universe was manifest. And the Aum is eternal. It resonates on forever and ever, without end.

Doesn’t that sound very much like what I am proposing; that the beat, which is your universe, is one vibration of an eternal sound?

And isn’t it really neat that they also believe that the three parts of that sound, A… U… M… represents The One in three forms: The “A” is for Brahma who is the god of creation and therefore the Big Bang. The “U” part of the sound is for Vishnu, who is the god of continued existence such as you now experience. And the final “M” sound is for Shiva, who is the god of destruction and release and therefore the Big Crunch.

When taken together “AUM” therefore is the wholeness and totality of all universes created at this frequency for all eternity.

Beautiful, isn’t it?

You can see that the information codified and still remembered in these ancient religious ideas is really quite profound. It comes to you from civilisations that predate yours. The civilisations themselves are long forgotten but the information passed on from them can still be found if you know where to look. And here it is: high-order physics and cosmology explained in terms understandable by all.

Z: Wow! That certainly is beautiful.

But as much as I find myself in wonderment at the intersection between this ancient wisdom, science and this new information you are sharing, I have to say that I am suddenly a little troubled by its implication too!

If our whole universe is one beat. If that beat is just tredecillionths of a second long. And if there are many billions of years worth of beats then… that’s a lot of universes!  And they are all chasing each other over the surface of the torus, one after each other? Is that what you are saying?

8: Well… yes and no. It depends on your perspective. From inside the illusion of space and time it can seem as if there are all these many, many separate universes, each originating as a beat of the Big Bang and propagating across the torus. From outside of time it is apparent that the whole of this creation is right now. The illusion of time-like change is just a function of the way you are moving across this creation. From outside of time this time-like progression is not readily observable. What is apparent from this perspective is a non-linear dance of fractal patterns that interplay between this torus and the other tori that this one is a part of.

Z: Uh oh! Wait, stop the bus! Which other tori?

8: You thought there was only this one torus? This, your “home” toroidal frame of space and time, is just what occurs at one particular frequency. There are many, many other toroidal frames of space and time, each occurring at their own frequency (their rate of quantum flicker). One way to understand this is that the other tori have a different speed of light from yours (And also different Planck’s parameters of the Big Bang as calculated by myself and all the other cosmologists (see above). In other words each torus has a different physics with different fundamental natural constants. Note, George).  Since each exists at a different vibratory rate from yours, you cannot in any way shape or form interact with these other realities. They are invisible and immaterial to you.

You can, if you like, imagine that your torus is like a layer of onion skin. Outside of yours is the next layer at a slightly higher vibratory rate and inside is a layer at a lower vibratory rate. And though it will confuse you for me to say this, I’ll say it anyway: the outermost skin is the inner-most skin. Exactly how this is so has to do with the next dimension, the 5th, where there is a “folding back” of all of these realities. But since we aren’t talking about that now, I shall simply affirm that, yes indeed; there are many, many other tori present in the greater creation that is Separation. But I don’t wish to confuse you by broadening this discussion too far. So I’ll say just one thing about these other tori. They too are actually one with the torus of your reality. All the tori together exchange energy at the singularity. At the singularity they are all one.

I raise this additional layer of complexifying information just to bring to your awareness that there is always more to every picture of reality than you can imagine. There is always more. And, yet, for all that, it always folds back to Oneness.

Z: How many times in one conversation can a mind be blown and still keep functioning (I laugh).

There is this question that I am clinging onto as I try to process this avalanche of new information. You are saying that this torus, my home torus, that I am now living inside of, which contains our universe at the 4th dimension, also simultaneously contains many other universes?

8: Indeed. “Many” is, however, too small a word. And while the number is not infinitely large, it is large enough that you can, from your limited perspective, think of it as such.

Z: …And that is just this torus!  You went on to say that there are many more tori…

8: Yes. Again, a large number. Not infinitely large but a very large number.

Z: So then there must be an insane number of different universes!

8: “An insane number” is quite descriptive.

Z: And they are all different? Totally unique?

8: “Totally unique” is a tautology. They are all different but the degree of novelty varies. Allow me to explain it in this fashion: your universe is as you experience it to be. Exactly one moment “behind” your universe is another that is very, very similar to yours. If you were to be “bumped back” to that universe you’d be very unlikely to notice any differences. If we were to transfer you to a universe a larger number of iterations back, you would encounter some noticeable differences. Perhaps you’d find yourself in a universe in which, for example, you had allowed yourself to be more motivated by fear and less by love. A universe in which you had not found the courage to follow your heart and publish book 1 of The Ascension Papers. Perhaps in that universe you are still doggedly clinging to a life in which you pursue the solution to your own sense of lack. Perhaps you feel motivated to do whatever is necessary to earn money rather than seeking your highest, most authentic expression, as it is for you in this universe.

Z: Really? Is there such a universe in which I am still just chasing money?

8: I was using that as an example so that you and our readers might understand the concept. As it happens, no, it is not your soul’s purpose that you become so entangled. The purpose of this lifetime, for you, was awakening. Remembrance. Self-discovery. What we have called “ascension”. So you are not present in a very broad band of possible alternate universes. You are not present for choices that are not congruent with your ascension. You make the kinds of choices you are now making or not at all.

Z: So… I make the kinds of choices I now make or I die?

8: No, you don’t understand. You don’t die as a punishment for wrong choices. That’s just silly. Death is a means of transitioning your consciousness out of that reality without harming the Veil. That’s all. Death has nothing to do with the topic at hand.

What I am saying is that each soul finds itself present in a number of “alternative” universes. You are either present in a universe or you are not. It comes down to the choices which your soul wishes to explore. I’ll give you an example: there is a universe in which you explore music as your primary expression. You become quite a talented musician and do quite well with this. The music becomes, for you, an expression of your spirituality. It is every bit as meaningful to you there as the words you now write are to you here. That is a valid choice for you. Your soul wanted to explore that. So there is an alternate “you” who does that. You can feel his influence, as he can feel yours, since you are of course the same person; just exploring different possibilities. You find yourself in this universe as it closely reflects your choices and beliefs back at you, while he is in a slightly different universe that reflects his choices and beliefs back at him. Your universes are slightly different, but your experiences of those respective universes is quite starkly different (Read also Seth on this topic; Note, George).

Z: Can you give me an example of how they differ?

8: There are many, many small differences and some really big ones. He, for example, does not have Lisa as a partner. Lisa plays a particular role in your life. Without Lisa there is no Ascension Papers. Lisa has an innate facility with “truth” that you have relied on in so many ways to make this kind of expression possible. This was desirable to your soul and so it is. The version of you who explores musical expression requires different influences. His life is quite different from yours, even though his universe is not very far from your own.

But let us leave this line of inquiry there. I don’t want to get too deeply into your personal story as it is not relevant to the discussion at hand and things are different for other souls. Some of your readers might, for example, have a fairly wide range of possible experiences. Their “footprint” might be much larger than yours. Which is another way of saying that they might be expressed in a broader band of concurrent universes.

Z: All right. So there are other universes that are very similar to this one close behind it. The further behind you get, the more dissimilar they become?

8: Yes. And it goes “forward” too. The notion of “backwards” and “forwards” are not actually significant. But never mind that right now.

Z: Whew!  This whole conversation is just about at the edge of what my mind can cope with. So, someone might choose one thing in this universe, but is choosing something else in another?

8: That is exactly what happens. You have heard of the concept of “time lines”? Well, the word is nonsensical since there is nothing linear about it other than your 3D thinking. There is a range of potentiality. As your Inner-Self, you decide what will be possible for you. Then, as the Outer-Self, you explore one subset of those possibilities. There are other Outer-Selves of the same soul who explore other possible variations. But the notion of Outer-Self is just a temporary illusion that you hold. What you are not aware of is that you can (and often do) move from one universe to another. (This is what the PAT members are now doing in a conscious manner – we are rapidly bilocating from one timeline to the next one which are part of different torus universes. Note, George).

Every time you make a choice of any significance – a real choice – a choice about who you really believe yourself to be, then you find yourself at a nexus point. Depending on what you choose, you shift your perspective; you move yourself to a reality that is congruent with that choice. As you change yourself, so you change your whole world. If you are the version of self that, for example, decides to love, trust and respect yourself unconditionally, then, as you enact that choice and make it real for yourself, so you navigate to a reality that reflects that back at you. You find yourself surrounded by others who feed that back to you; others who are respectful of you; others who show you love; others who are trustworthy and also trusting of you. You become a greater version of yourself and your world becomes a brighter place (This is the essentially the principle of ascension, where there will be one final leap to a distant reality in the “future” which is our ascension reality and already exists. Note, George).

Z: Woooow! You see… I know this stuff to be true! I mean, I know it works like that. From my spiritual practice and from processes I engage upon with my Soul Re-Integration clients, I have seen that it is an absolute fact that, for each of us, our reality reflects ourselves back at us, but now I understand how that is possible!  It’s because there are these alternative universes!

But explain further why you say these are not “time lines”?

8: The concept of “timelines” implies that, once you are on a line, you are going to one fixed destination. Like being a train on a track. And nothing is further from the truth. You are a conscious being. You are the part of your Inner Self that gets to choose and decide which, of all the possible experiences, you are going to observe as your life. You can move far faster and further than you might believe when you reach a place of being willing to radically alter your beliefs and self-conception. You have no idea how powerful you really are since it appears to you as if the world around you is a fixed thing. You really have no idea!

Z: I am totally intrigued by this!

So tell me, 8, if I am only present in this narrow band of universes then obviously my experiences of life are all quite similar to this one?

8: Yes. As Arn, you are only observing a small range of possibilities.

Z: So there are universes very, very different from this one that are still on the same torus?

8: Vastly different, yes. This torus is really just a particular tone of the 4th dimension. It is a frequency. Everything that every soul ever wanted to experience at this tone must be accommodated. It must be possible somewhere. So there are many different universes that are composed with different rules and different consensual structures.

Z: Examples?

8: The overwhelming majority of what is “out there” further away from your universe is so different from what you know that you would find it unimaginable. For this reason it would be nearly impossible to describe to you. Small changes in the mechanics of the universe result in wildly different outcomes. The planets and stars you take for granted are not even possible in most universes. These magnificent, complex organic life forms that populate many planets in this universe are quite unusual – certainly not common to all universes! Elsewhere life forms are so inherently different from yours that you would simply fail to imagine. What I am saying is that the kinds of life-forms and experiences that would populate even your most outrageous sci-fi or fantasy story would actually take place either in your universe or in a universe quite close to your own.

Z: Fascinating…

And what about “past lives”?

8: Good question. Of course past lives are no more “in the past” than your alternate possible lives are. When you really begin to understand this, you will get that there is actually no “past” and no “future”. It’s all just experiences in the topography of the torus.  So “past lives” do not happen “before” this one – even if you chose to remember them in that fashion. These other incarnations are also alternates to your current one but, since you are telling yourself some very different story and holding some very different beliefs and self-conceptions in those lives, you find yourself exploring a different universe or, quite likely, a different part of a very similar universe.

So it is, of course, possible that you might have an incarnation in another time frame of this exact same universe. It is equally possible to incarnate into a different time-frame of a different universe. Anything is possible. It’s all up to what your soul wishes to explore and what the very best setting for that exploration might be.

Z: Okay. And then what about the other tori?  Take one that exists at a faster flicker rate, for example. Can I also incarnate there? And what would life be like there?

8: Yes. The basic answer remains the same: you incarnate wherever you need to. It’s not about the place it’s about you. Before incarnating you begin with the question, “what beliefs and self-conceptions do I wish to hold in this incarnation?” You are placed in a reality that permits that.  That is about the simplest way I can explain this.

Again, the tori closest to your own in flicker rate are most similar to your own. I don’t wish to get bogged down trying to explain all of this to you though so I will simply offer you some examples from your own soul’s journey: your wizard lifetime (Zingdad note: please see The Ascension Papers, Book 1, Chapter 1. An Introduction to Zingdad) occurs in a reality structurally similar to the one you now inhabit. This is because it traveled somewhat in parallel to this one. But that lifetime played out in a torus that existed at a very slightly higher flicker rate. This higher flicker rate is what permits activities that you would now term “magic”.

To be continued…

Well, friends, I do hope you have enjoyed that which I have offered thus far. I publish this in its existing form on my website for your enjoyment. I am actively writing again so there will be more to follow soon. Please make sure that you have registered for membership here on my site if you wish to be updated (by newsletter) as additional material is made available.

Some of the issues I intend to still take up with 8 include:

*  The nature of the torus itself (how it comes into existence and what it is made of)

*  What is dark matter and dark energy?

*  What is light? What are photons?

*  What IS time? He has talked a lot about it but I want a deeper understanding still.

*  Why is time relative (a’la Einstein)?

*  If everything is alive and conscious… is the universe itself alive? And if it is, is it self-conscious? Is the universe a “someone”?

*  What’s the deal with black holes? What happens if something falls into one?

*  What about quantum weirdness such as Heisenberg’s uncertainty principle. Why does it work like that?

I hope to get to some (most? all???) of these questions in the remaining parts of this chapter.

Please note that the preceding work is only the provisional version. I will thoroughly edit this work, possibly re-writing portions of it for greater accuracy or, as clearer insights arrive, before it is published in ebook and paperback form.

This entry was posted in Ascension. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.