By Demitra M. N. and Georgi Stankov, July 8, 2012
hope all is well with you.
I don’t recall if the link for this Ascension Study Guide (below) was ever posted in your newsletter before and I missed it, but I’ve recently come across it while surfing online and thought it may be of interest. It’s only 88 pages long but it cuts through to the gist and includes visuals to for a quicker grasp of the matter (recently updated January 2012).The link seems to indicate a connection to Cosmic Awareness yet the author is one Master Tony. Hope you find it useful enough to share with others.
Demitra M. N.
I have not come upon this ascension manual before and I have not posted it on my website and I do not intend to publish it. This is a pure compilation that represents a very unhealthy mixture of half-true statements, very apodictic statements that cannot be proven by any means as they have no real background and many false statements that make this whole composition counter-productive to what it intends to achieve – ascension.
As it is not worth delving into details and proving why this manual is of no value, I would only mention that I did not come across the central piece of ascension – the LBP and how it is personally felt by humans. Ultimately my impression is that this self-proclaimed ascension master Tony has not yet entered the LBP and has compiled all this information second-hand. This makes up for a lot of mechanical, esoteric trash, but this is not the way that leads to personal ascension.
With love and light
This is your newsletter and of course you will print in it what serves your purpose. Namely to promote ascension strictly from your perspective. This is by no means wrong, however, ascension is not a one-size-fits-all process, and therefore to focus on it as though it were, is a very biased approach and certainly does not allow for everyone out there who would want to join this forum, to do so.
Now I am not going to defend this ascension guide per se because although a good deal of it resonates with me, some of it in fact does not. My intention here is to point out that in dismissing it out of hand, it is not unlike throwing the baby out with the bathwater. When I say that it resonates with me, please understand that this means I am able to make rational and logical connections to the information contained therein, which arise from my own personal direct experiences, even if you find nothing of value in it for yourself. I point this out because there may have been other readers out there who just might have arrived at similar conclusions had they been given the chance to do so.
Essentially, this is not an objection about your decision to not post the link as much as it is an emphasis on the fact that you are in this instance, overlooking the uniqueness of each of your readers and that they each have the right to arrive at their own conclusions, as you yourself did and do. In deciding for them what their ascension process ought to be, or not to be, you are not teaching individuals to trust themselves through their own process but rather you are commandeering the process via omission and by providing a very one-sided position from which they can compare their own experiences against.
As I said, this is your newsletter and you are free to do with it as you please but is that what this newsletter is really is all about, ascension strictly from your own very particular point-of-view? That’s all very well and good I suppose but if it is, then I don’t see how it is any less prejudiced than many other websites, forums and newsletters out there that you yourself have found slanted, partial and wanting.
Finally, as for this ascension guide not mentioning the LBP, even you have said that the LBP is not something that everyone will go through, and even when they do, it isn’t likely to be experienced in the same way between any two people. In this regard, it is very possible that the author has not had such experiences himself and therefore cannot speak on the subject without being dishonest. But this is just a supposition on my part, I honestly don’t know the author and so can only speculate as to the reason he has omitted it.
In any case, I do appreciate your having taken a moment to look through the guide and to offer your point-of-view even if we didn’t see eye to eye on it.
Demitra M. N.
I only said that this text is a compilation and that it does not contain any personal, individual knowledge and insight of the author on ascension. And this is the key weakness of this text. I can tell you from where he has plagiarised much of his information. One source I can immediately name is Tony Stubbs, A Handbook of Ascension and Tachira Tachi-Ren, The Light Body Process. There are many more and you find none of this in form of references in this highly plagiarised book.
My duty is indeed to filter information. Otherwise this website will end as the garbage lot most other esoteric websites represent. This is the primary objective of the new theory of the Universal Law – to discern contradictions, inconsistencies, false statements, paradoxes etc. and to expose and disregard them. Only in such a way can one reach the purity of mind and progress in the ascension process.
I am fully aware that these high standards do not apply to most of the people on this planet and this is the reason why I do not search for a greater popularity in Internet, although I could have done it, as most other New Age gurus with an immense medial greed regularly do.
It is not my duty to present a forum for all spectra of esoteric confusion on my website. I do not see anything positive in this kind of false objectivity. This is precisely the chief source of human confusion on earth.
The more the people will evolve in the coming months, the more they will begin to appreciate the purity of ideas presented on this website and will turn away from past confusion.
Let me make you aware of the basic fact that this website was initially established as a platform to propagate the new theory of the Universal Law, which none of my reader has understood so far. But the time will come soon when this will be the case and then all other scientific books, publications, and texts that comprise nowadays 99,99…% of the whole scientific literature will be recognized as garbage and left behind.
The text on ascension you have recommended will have the same destiny – the very process of ascension will make it obsolete – it is already obsolete. I see this development in perspective and act accordingly in wise anticipation.
With love and light
Thank you for this more recent clarification regarding your aims but isn’t an aim as specific, as you have made yours, just as ambitious as many other person’s out there who you’ve often defined as self-serving and acquisitive? After all, an aim is the working out of a personal ambition and is both worthy and unworthy depending only on who’s judging and interpreting it. And so ambition is not a bad thing in itself, I only point it out to show that though your focus is uniquely your own, the self-serving similarities of ambition are strikingly indistinguishable regardless of who is doing the pursuing.
In any case, I honestly do respect your right to do this in the way that serves your personal growth and I thank you for allowing me to express myself.
Before I sign off might I point out that the name Tony Stubbs you’ve offered up below, and the pseudonym Master Tony, do seem to enjoy a common point of reference, that being the name Tony. As I said before, I have no idea who authored this guide but it might be that Tony Stubbs and Master Tony are the same person. Maybe not, merely entertaining the possibility.
again, thank you, and best regards,
Demitra M. N.
I am sorry but I have the impression that we are discussing at completely different levels without any interception and you continue to misunderstand my basic ideas and arguments.
First of all, let me make you aware of the obvious fact that I am the most open minded editor of an esoteric website in the whole Internet and introduce incessantly new sources and ideas from other people, which I or other readers find and suggest, as soon as I have evaluated them diligently as truthful and being of any information value.
Nowhere in the whole Internet will you will find a greater diversity of ideas and openness of minds at the highest possible intellectual level as on this website. You have yourself contributed to such discussions and should actually appreciate this asset of our PAT platform. If this editing policy is service-to-self in your opinion, then you must have turned the whole enlightenment idea of ascension upside down and it is hence natural that you cannot follow my arguments.
There is a second basic fact that you seem to have not grasped yet. The new theory of the Universal Law is not my personal indulgence, but the science of the future. It is objectively true beyond my or any other personality. This whole system of all-encompassing human weltanschauung is faultless, as it comes from the highest dimensions and I am just the human conduit on the ground. My only duty on the earth is, after I have moulded this theory into a written form on more than 5000 pages, which you have obviously not read or have not understood, otherwise you will not argue in this way, is to keep this theory from all possible attempts to dilute it or distort it.
And there have been a number of attempts, yours now including, that have been made consciously or subconsciously, it does not matter much, as the result is the same – the “Fall from Grace”. All these attempts stem from their fundamental ignorance, what the theory of the Universal Law is all about – it is not about ascension, which is a personal achievement, but it is well beyond human ascension. It is the spiritual manual how the future transgalactic society of mankind will be organized after ascension.
The new theory of the Universal Law is the greatest achievement of all times of this human civilisation as objectively judged. It has nothing to do with service-to-self, but with universal standards of knowledge. You are either at the intellectual level to perceive this or you are not. In the latter case your judgments are indeed coming from lower motives that have nothing to do with pure intelligence, which is the most precious good in this universe.
I am sorry for being so blunt, but otherwise you will not understand me and will continue to dwell in your self-erected, esoteric ivory towers, which have nothing to do with true OPEN-minded spirituality.
With love and light